Thursday, June 23, 2011

The Pac-12 & The Landmark Deal



The SEC has its own network deal with ESPN and CBS. The Big-Ten has their own network deal with Fox Sports. The Texas Longhorns have their own deal with ESPN starting August 26th. Now you can add the Pac-12 to the list. The soon-to-be Pac-12 conference reached a "landmark" deal with ESPN and Fox Media Group. The deal will take place in 2012 when the Pac-12 will have their inaugural season as a conference. Pac-12 Commissioner Larry Scott had three objective in creating this conference. Here are his following objectives: 
1. Quantum Leap in revenue 
Larry Scott is no stranger to making landmark deals. While he was the CEO of the Women's Tennis Association (WTA), he landed a six-year $88 million deal with Sony Ericsson. It was the largest sponsorship deal in women's sports history. He makes another landmark deal as the Pac-12 Commissioner by creating a 12-year deal with ESPN and Fox Sports. 
This deal will make $3 billion in conference revenue. This revenue will top the financial powerhouses like the SEC and the Big Ten. The conference will make $250 million annually, while each school shares in the profits for $21 million a piece. It's way more money than $600 million the conference received in media revenue last season. The deal will include the new schools, like Colorado and Utah, who will join the conference on July 1st. Each school is a part of an equitable, revenue sharing plan where each schools shares in equal profits in media revenue. Teams like USC and Oregon can't get more money because they draw bigger TV ratings. The revenue from this deal will be "adding back the sports that have been cut" as stated by Commissioner Scott. 
2. More National Exposure 
The Pac-10 (soon-to-be Pac-12) Football already have exposure from networks like ABC, ESPN, and Fox Sports Net. In addition to those deals, the new deal with will have Pac-12 Football on FOX and FX. The Pac-12 Title Game will be aired on FOX for this year (2011) and next year's (2012) season. After that, ESPN will hold the title game and rotate with FOX every other year until the deal is done in 2023. ESPN and FOX will rotate on the 44 games a year that will be on national television. The rest will on the Commissioner's third objective being the Pac-12 Network. 
3. The Pac-12 Network 
The Pac-12 Network will one of three companies by entity of Pac-12 Enterprise. The other two companies, Pac-12 Digital and Pac-12 Promotions, will increase the league's visibility in the national media. The network will hold football games, men's basketball games, and most women's basketball games that's not on FOX and/or ESPN networks. With there "main revenue" sports in tact, there will also be an in-house network that provides the conference to air there "Olympic" sports. Commissioner Larry Scott said that "We are prolific when it comes to Olympic sports. We want a vehicle to promote our Olympic sports."
In my opinion, I like the ESPN/FOX deal with the Pac-12. It's a very unique deal that can benefit the conference and college sports on the west coast. Every school, including the new teams like Colorado and Utah, are created equally and share in equal revenue. This conference will be able to get the top high school recruits and compete for championship in college athletics. As a SEC fan, I think this is the conference that can compete with them the SEC in the future. I like the idea that the conference will use the money to bring back the sports programs that have been cut in the past. Much love and respect to the Pac-12 in the future. I might even travel from the Panhandle of Florida to see a Pac-12 football game in the future. 

References 

Saturday, June 18, 2011

The 2011 NFL Lockout

Anyone who has recently watched ESPN has heard of the current NFL lockout. Football fans and analyst would normally be talking about draft picks, free agency, and how the Green Bay Packers can repeat as Super Bowl Champions. All that has changed since the NFL players and owners can’t agree on a new collective bargaining agreement that expired on March 1st, 2011. It’s a very complicated issue, but here are the following issues affecting this current NFL lockout:

1. An Extended Season
The NFL season is usually a 16-game season with three or four playoffs games. A playoff team can play 17 – 20 games in a single season depending on where that team was ranked. The owners requested for an 18-game season to make money via ticket sales, merchandise, and television revenue. Many of the players opposed this proposal because it would increase their chances of getting injured without compensation. If the NFL owners want this, they will have to pay the players more by giving them a bigger share of the money and health benefits. In addiction to that, there have been talks about minimizing or eliminating the NFL preseason in the process of an 18-game season.

2. Salaries
This issue is always big with players and owners. Players want more money and the owners don’t want overblown salaries. In any sport, a salary cap was designed to have a level playing field for all teams. There was no salary cap for the 2010 season because the NFL owners used their option to extend the collective bargaining agreement for another year. All 32 teams are different when it comes to the salary cap. The issue would be how much each team’s salary would increase or decrease over time.

3. Revenue Sharing
The most talked about and scrutinized issue in this whole lockout is the issue revenue sharing. The whole “money pie” is made up of $9 billion. Both sides are arguing which side gets the most. If not the most, than the percentage of money both sides can agree to. They are other key issues that play a major role in deciding the revenue sharing for both players and owners.

4. Financial Information
This issue is more about trust than releasing information about finances. The players feel like the owners haven’t been honest about the money they really make. The players requested that the owners reveal their financial records of how they make and earn money. The owners declined that request. Even with this issue being about finances, the real issue here is lack of trust. 

5. Rookie Salaries
One of the few things that both sides agree on is to change the rookie salary. There have been a lot of rookie athletes who come into the league with a big time contract, yet they’ve been untested in the game of football. Some of the contracts these rookies get is something a veteran player might receive over time. For example, when quarterback Jamarcus Russell was drafted as the first overall pick in the 2007 NFL Draft, he was given $62 million contract with $32 million guaranteed. Needless to say for Raiders fans, it didn’t work out. Both sides will likely agree on a sliding scales based on the round a player was drafted.

This issued has become one of the biggest union debates to come in professional sports in the last five years. The NHL and NBA have had their union disputes in the past, but both sports don’t even compare to the NFL. The NFL is “king” in America and any labor dispute the league has will be magnified more closely than other sports. Regardless of who wins, the NFL fans still lose if there is no NFL season. No one knows for sure when a deal would get done to insure an NFL season in 2011. All I know is that the fans would rather hear about player contracts than union/league contracts.

References
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/15241433/distrustful-owners-hold-the-key-to-unlocking-the-lockout

Friday, June 3, 2011

Jay-Z vs. David Ortiz: The 40/40 Feud


This case can be viewed as Boston v. New York in the courtroom. In 2010, Rapper Jay-Z (Noted Yankee fan) and a business partner sued Boston slugger David Ortiz in a Manhattan courtroom. The lawsuit was for trademark infringement over the name of Ortiz's nightclub in Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic) called Forty-Forty. The lawsuit was seeking over $5 Million in damages and have Ortiz not use the 40/40 name off Jay-Z's fame.

Jay-Z owns an upscale nightclub called the 40/40 Club. His nightclub chain can be found in places like Manhattan (NY), Las Vegas (NV), and Atlantic City (NJ). The club name referenced the rare baseball feat of 40 home runs and 40 stolen bases in one season. The lawsuit states that David Ortiz was "fully aware" of the 40/40 nightclub in Manhattan before he opened his club called "Forty/Forty". Ortiz was a noted patron at the club on several occasions.

Jay-Z and his team of attorneys could not hold claim to the "Forty/Forty" name in the Dominican Republic. The attorneys went after Ortiz in the U.S. registration he used to set-up his website for the club. In the end, the court ruled in favor of the Plaintiff (Jay-Z). The name was too similar to Jay-Z's 40/40 Nightclub. David Ortiz agreed to settle out of court by taking down the infringing website and change the name of his nightclub in Santo Domingo. No word yet on what his new club name is in Santo Domingo.


References